Chapter 2.70 CONSTITUTIONAL TAKING ISSUES
Section 2.70.060 Review procedures
The following procedures for review of a final decision shall be followed:
A. Final Decision. The person petitioning for
review shall obtain a final decision
before requesting review.
B. Petition for Review. Within thirty days from
the date of the final decision, the
person requesting the review shall file, in the office of the city recorder, a written
petitioner for review of that decision. A copy shall also be filed with the city attorney.
C. Hearing Date. The mayor, or the mayor's designee,
shall set a time to review the
decision that gave rise to the petition as soon as reasonably practical. The mayor, or the
mayor's designee, shall hear and consider the evidence related to and submitted by the
petitioner, the city or other interested parties. In the discretion of the mayor, or the
mayor's designee, the hearing may be oral or based upon written submittals.
D. Initial Filing Information. As part of the
petition for review, the petitioner shall
submit, at least seven days prior to the date of the review, the following:
1. The name of the petitioner
requesting review.
2. The name and business address
of the current owner of the property; the form of
ownership, i.e., whether sole proprietorship, for-profit or not-for-profit corporation,
partnership, joint venture or other; and if owned by other than a real person, name and
address of all partners or shareholders owning ten percent or more of the outstanding
shares.
3. A detailed description of
the factual and legal grounds for the claim that here
has been an unconstitutional taking, without just compensation;
4. A legal description of the
property allegedly taken and a detailed description of
the nature of the property; and
5. A description of the protectable
property interest claimed to be affected.
E. Supplemental Information. If the mayor, or
the mayor's designee, determines that
there may be a taking, and additional information is needed, the mayor, or the mayor's
designee, may further require the following to be submitted.
1. The evidence and documentation
as to the value of the property interest claimed
taken, including the date and cost at the date the property was acquired. This material
should include any evidence of the value of that same property before and after the
alleged unconstitutional taking; the name of the party from whom purchased, including
the relationship, if any, between the person requesting a review; and the party from whom
the property was acquired;
2. The terms, including sale
price, of any previous purchase or sale of a full or
partial interest in the property during the three years prior to the date of application;
3. All appraisals of the property
prepared for any purpose, including financing,
offering for sale, or ad valorem taxation, within the three years;
4. The assessed value of and
ad valorem taxes on the property for the previous
three years;
5. All information concerning
current mortgages or other loans secured by the
property including the name of the mortgage holder or lender, current interest rate,
remaining loan balance and term of the loan and other significant provisions, including
but not limited to, the right of purchasers to assume the loan;
6. All listings of the property
for sale or rent, price asked and offers received, if
any, within the previous three years;
7. All studios commissioned
by the petitioner or agents of the petitioner within the
previous three years concerning feasibility of development or utilization of the property;
8. For income producing property,
itemized income and expense statements from
the property for the previous three years.
9. Information from a title policy
or other source showing all recorded lien and
encumbrances affecting the property; and
10. The mayor, or the mayor's
designee, may request additional information
reasonable necessary, in their opinion, to arrive at a conclusion concerning the nature of
and the value of the alleged unconstitutional taking.
(Ord. 2003-13, Add, 04/02/2003)